Non-caustic cleaning composition comprising peroxygen compound and specific silicate, and method of making the same in free-flowing, particulate form

ABSTRACT

The present invention discloses an alkaline cleaning composition for cleaning heavily soiled metal surfaces such as food fryers, baking pans, high temperature pasteurizers, and beer kettles, ceramic surfaces such as restaurant grade ceramic china plates and platters, and plastic surfaces. The cleaning composition is noncaustic and includes a peroxygen compound, a chelate, and a metasilicate and/or sesquisilicate. A preferred cleaning composition further includes a surfactant and hydrated builder.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. applicationSer. No. 08/609,565, filed Mar. 1, 1996, (now issued as U.S. Pat. No.5,789,361) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No.08/396,971, filed Mar. 1, 1995, (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,663,132)both of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a cleaning composition and morespecifically to an alkaline cleaning composition for removing protein,grease and other organic deposits and stains from articles such as thoseused in the food industry.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the food processing industry, the cleaning of equipment is asignificant problem. In many applications, the high temperaturesemployed cause difficult-to-remove organic deposits, such as baked-oncarbon and hydrolyzed protein, to form on the equipment. In the dairyindustry, for example, the pasteurizing equipment is heated totemperatures in excess of 160° F. to sterilize dairy products. At suchtemperatures, a blue-black organic deposit, that is very difficult toremove with known cleaners, commonly forms on the equipment.

Caustic cleaners are commonly used to remove organic deposits butcaustic cleaners are unsafe and require substantially elevatedtemperatures to work effectively and are extremely difficult to removeby rinsing. Many caustic cleaners, such as those incorporating sodiumhydroxide, are corrosive to skin and produce hazardous fumes. Suchcaustic cleaners can also corrode or scar metal (e.g., aluminum andbrass), and destroy many types of floor, wall and countertop surfaces.For instance, sodium hydroxide should not be used on aluminum sincereactions will occur which are corrosive to the metal. At temperaturesin excess of 160° F., which are normally required to remove organicdeposits, caustic cleaners can consume oxygen. In tanks and other typesof substantially closed vessels, the consumption of oxygen can cause adecrease in the internal pressure of the vessel leading to vesselcollapse. To remove the caustic cleaners, an elaborate set of steps isfollowed, typically requiring high temperatures and neutralization.

To avoid the problems associated with caustic cleaners, noncausticcleaners, which are typically not as effective as caustic cleaners, areemployed in many applications. Because of the reduced effectiveness ofthe noncaustic cleaners, additional time and labor is required to removestubborn organic deposits. Noncaustic cleaners are sometimes initiallyused to remove a portion of the organic deposits with the remainderbeing removed by caustic cleaners. In this manner, the use of causticcleaners is reduced as much as possible.

There is a need for a non-hazardous cleaner for removing organicdeposits, such as those encountered in the food industry, that is safeto use and will not damage the surfaces to be cleaned. Particularly,there is a need to provide a cleaner that is noncorrosive to skin andthe surfaces to be cleaned and that will not consume oxygen at hightemperatures.

There is a further need to provide a cleaner that is capable of removingorganic deposits at relatively low temperatures.

There is a further need for an all purpose cleaner having a wide rangeof applications, including the removal of organic deposits from deep fatfryers or bakery pans, to replace caustic and noncaustic cleaners.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention addresses these and other needs by providing acleaning composition which includes at least a peroxygen compound, ametasilicate or sesquisilicate, and a chelate. The cleaning compositionis typically in a dry or granulated state and can be combined with asuitable carrier, typically water, to form a cleaning solution.

The peroxygen compound is preferably a perborate or a percarbonate andmore preferably a percarbonate. The perborate or percarbonate preferablyis complexed with a metal such as sodium, lithium, calcium, potassium orboron. The preferred amount of the peroxygen compound in the cleaningcomposition, when in the dry or granular state, is at least about 25% byweight and more preferably ranges from about 25% to about 40% by weightof the cleaning composition.

The metasilicate and sesquisilicate are preferably anhydrous. Thepreferred amount of the metasilicate and/or sesquisilicate in thecleaning composition, when in the dry or granular state, is at leastabout 15% by weight and more preferably ranges from about 15% to about40% by weight of the cleaning composition.

The chelate is preferably a derivative of a carboxylic or phosphonicacid. More preferably, the chelate is selected from the group consistingof ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ("EDTA"),N-hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid ("NTA"), and poly(alkylphosphonicacid). The preferred amount of the chelate in the cleaning composition,when in the dry or granular state, is at least about 2% by weight andmore preferably ranges from about 2% to about 8% by weight of thecleaning composition.

In one embodiment, the peroxygen compound, metasilicate and chelate areall salts having the same cation. The preferred cation is sodium orpotassium.

The composition can include a builder. The builder is preferably acarbonate, sulfate, phosphate, or mixture thereof. The carbonate ispreferably at least one of the following compounds: a sodium carbonate(e.g., soda ash), sodium sesquicarbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. Thesulfate is preferably sodium sulfate. The phosphate is preferably atleast one of the following compounds: a tripolyphosphate, trisodiumpolyphosphate, sodium potassium pyrophosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate,disodium phosphate, monosodium phosphate. The carbonate and phosphateare preferably in the hydrated form. The preferred amount of the builderin the cleaning composition, when in the dry or granular state, is fromabout 15% to about 75% by weight of the cleaning composition.

The ratios of the various components are important in many applications.The preferred weight ratio of the peroxygen compound to the chelateranges from about 7:1 to 3:1. The preferred weight ratio of themetasilicate and sesquisilicate to the surfactant ranges from about 5:1to about 15:1.

The cleaning composition can include a surfactant to act as a wettingagent, emulsifying agent, and/or dispersing agent. The preferred amountof the surfactant in the cleaning composition, when in the dry orgranular state, ranges from about 2.5% to about 5% by weight of thecleaning composition.

The cleaning composition can include a gelling agent for adhering thecleaning composition to a desired surface. Preferred gelling agentsinclude carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxymethylcellulose and modifiedpolyacrylamide. The preferred amount of the gelling agents in thecleaning composition, when in the dry or granular state, ranges fromabout 5% to about 10% by weight of the cleaning composition.

As noted above, the cleaning composition can be combined with water toform a cleaning solution. The cleaning solution preferably contains fromabout 92% to about 99% water by weight with the remainder constitutingthe cleaning composition. The pH of the cleaning solution preferablyranges from about pH 9 to about pH 12.

In another embodiment of the subject invention, the cleaning compositionincludes (a) a peroxygen compound; (b) at least about 15% by weight of ametasilicate and/or sesquisilicate; and (c) a chelate that is at leastone of a carboxylic acid, phosphonic acid and salt thereof. Theperoxygen compound, metasilicate and chelate can be salts having thesame cation. The cleaning composition can further include a surfactantand a builder as described above. In yet another embodiment of thepresent invention, a method for cleaning an object is provided includingthe steps of: (i) applying a cleaning solution to the object wherein thecleaning solution includes (a) at least about 25% by weight of apercarbonate compound; (b) at least one of a metasilicate andsesquisilicate; (c) a builder including at least one of the following: asulfate, phosphate, and a carbonate; and (d) a chelate; and (ii)removing the cleaning solution from the object. The object can becomposed of a broad variety of materials, including a metal, such asbrass, stainless steel, aluminum, or a ceramic or plastic material.

The method can further include one or more of the following steps: (i)soaking the object in the cleaning solution at a temperature less thanabout 190° F.; (ii) spraying the object with the cleaning solution at atemperature of less than about 100° F.; (iii) circulating the cleaningsolution about the object at a temperature less than about 190° F.;and/or (iv) rinsing the object with water to remove the cleaningsolution.

In many applications, the cleaning composition of the present inventionis significantly more effective and safer than caustic cleaners inremoving organic deposits. The cleaning composition can generally beused effectively at temperatures lower than the temperatures at whichcaustic cleaners are used. It is believed that, depending on thecleaning task and the duration of application, cleaning solutionsaccording to the present invention typically need not be used attemperatures higher than about 100° F. In most applications, thecleaning composition is safer to use than caustic cleaners. Unlike manycaustic cleaners, the cleaning composition generally does not producedangerous fumes and is not corrosive to skin. The cleaning compositionalso does not corrode or scar metals such as aluminum, stainless steel,and brass. In high temperature tank cleaning operations, the cleaningcomposition can release oxygen and thereby produces a counter-pressurewhich helps prevent tank collapse.

The cleaning composition has a number of other advantages relative toexisting cleaners. In some applications, the cleaning compositionprovides an all purpose cleaner that can replace existing caustic andnoncaustic cleaners. The cleaning composition thereby reduces the laborand time required to clean equipment. In some applications, the cleaningcomposition is environmentally benign. The release of oxygen by thecomposition facilitates compliance of the cleaning solution with theregulations regarding chemical and biological oxygen levels in wastewater. The cleaning composition thereby often requires little or notreatment in primary waste water treatment facilities, as generallyrequired by many existing cleaners. In some applications, the cleaningcomposition has a pH level acceptable to municipal waste water treatmentfacilities. In particular, a pH level between 9 and 12 is expected fromthe use of the present cleaning composition.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides an alkaline cleaning composition forcleaning heavily soiled surfaces especially in the processing andstoring of foods. The cleaning composition removes a wide range offoreign deposits, such as grease, protein, baked-on carbon and charredorganics, and other types of organic and inorganic deposits and stains.The cleaning composition removes foreign deposits from a wide variety ofobjects such as food fryers, baking pans, high temperature pasteurizingequipment, beer kettles, ceramic china plates, platters, brass andaluminum filters, metal, ceramic or plastic parts and equipment,aluminum baking pans, carpets, fabrics, and the like.

In a preferred embodiment, the cleaning composition includes (a) aperoxygen compound, (b) a metasilicate and/or sesquisilicate, (c) abuilder, and (d) a chelate. Preferably, the cleaning composition issubstantially free of chlorine-containing compounds and hydroxides. Thecleaning composition is typically in a dry, granulated form which isdissolved in a carrier, such as water, to form a cleaning solutionbefore use. The cleaning solution can be applied by a mechanicalsprayer, soak-tank, or other suitable technique. In a preferredembodiment, the cleaning solution is effective at temperatures of nomore than about 190° F., and more preferably no more than about 100° F.

While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that theperoxygen compound and chelate react synergistically to remove mostforeign deposits. The peroxygen compound releases oxygen molecules whichbreak down bonds in the foreign deposit. The chelate reacts with andties up dissolved metals in the water which would otherwise react withand neutralize the oxygen. It is further believed that the metasilicateand builder peptize or emulsify (e.g. solubilize) proteins or fat. Themetasilicate and builder together provide sufficient alkalinity tosaponify the high levels of fat in many foreign deposits.

The peroxygen compound preferably includes a perborate or a percarbonateand more preferably a percarbonate. The perborate or percarbonate can becomplexed with a metal, preferably one selected from the group includingsodium, lithium, calcium, potassium, and boron. The cleaning compositionpreferably includes at least about 25% by weight and more preferablyfrom about 25% to about 40% by weight, and most preferably from about25% to about 35% by weight, of the peroxygen compound. The metasilicateand sesquisilicate are preferably in the anhydrous form and arecompleted with a metal selected from the group including sodium andpotassium. The cleaning composition preferably includes at least about15% by weight and more preferably an amount ranging from about 20% toabout 40% by weight and most preferably from about 25% to about 35% byweight of the metasilicate and/or sesquisilicate.

The chelate is preferably a derivative of a carboxylic or phosphonicacid. More preferably, the chelate is selected from the group consistingof EDTA, NTA, and other derivatives of a carboxylic acid and phosphonicacid and derivatives of phosphonic acid, such as poly(alkylphosphonicacid) (e.g., sold under the trademark ACUSOL 505ND). The EDTA acid ispreferably in the form of a salt, such as a sodium salt ("ETDA-Na₄ ") ora potassium salt, as the salt is more water soluble than the acid. Thecleaning composition preferably includes at least about 2% by weight andmore preferably an amount ranging from about 2% to about 8% by weightand most preferably from about 4% to about 6% by weight of the chelate,with the optimum amount being about 5% by weight.

In one embodiment, the peroxygen compound, metasilicate, and chelate areall salts having the same cation. More preferably, all of the salts inthe cleaning composition have the same cation. The preferred cation issodium or potassium.

The builder preferably includes at least a sulfate, a phosphate or acarbonate. The sulfate can be a sodium sulfate. The phosphate can be atripolyphosphate, trisodium polyphosphate, sodium potassiumpyrophosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, disodium phosphate, monosodiumphosphate, and mixtures thereof. The carbonate can be a sodiumcarbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and mixturesthereof. When the cleaning composition includes a surfactant, thecarbonate and phosphate are preferably in the hydrated form, such astrona or soda ash.

While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that thehydrated builders, such as the hydrated phosphates and/or carbonates,form bonds with the surfactants which are hydrophilic substances,thereby immobilizing the surfactant and water. As will be appreciated,the surfactant and water will react with the peroxygen compound unlessthe surfactant and water are immobilized. The reaction reduces andtherefore neutralizes the peroxygen compound while causing the releaseof oxygen gas. The reaction not only adversely impacts the shelf lifeand cleaning efficiency of the cleaning composition but also can cause ahazardous pressure build up from the released oxygen gas. The use ofadequate amounts of hydrated builders has been found to substantiallyeliminate these problems.

The amount of hydrated builder in the cleaning composition depends uponthe amount of surfactant in the cleaning composition. Preferably, themolar ratio of the hydrated builder to the surfactant is at least about4 parts of hydrated builder to one part surfactant and more preferablyranges from about 6 to about 22 parts of hydrated builder to one partsurfactant, and most preferably ranges from about 8 to about 10 parts ofhydrated builder to one part surfactant. In most applications, thepreferred amount of hydrated builder in the cleaning composition is atleast about 20% by weight and more preferably ranges from about 25% toabout 45% by weight of the cleaning composition.

The total amount of builder in the cleaning composition (both in thehydrated and anhydrous forms) varies depending upon the application. Thecleaning composition preferably includes from about 20% to about 75% byweight and more preferably from about 20% to about 50% by weight of thebuilder.

It has been discovered that phosphate builders have several beneficialeffects on the performance of the cleaning composition in addition toimmobilizing the surfactant and water. The phosphate helps the chelatebuild up free metals and keep soils in suspension. In sufficientamounts, the phosphate has been found to have improved rinsibility andreduced streaking, and dry blending of the cleaning composition is muchless difficult. Preferably, the cleaning composition contains from about3% to about 15% by weight phosphates.

The ratios of the various components are important parameters in manyapplications. Preferably, the weight ratio of the peroxygen compound tothe chelator ranges from about 3:1 to 7:1 and more preferably is about6:1. The preferred weight ratio of the metasilicate and sesquisilicateto the surfactant preferably ranges from about 5:1 to about 15:1 andmost preferably is about 9:1. The preferred weight ratio of themetasilicate and sesquisilicate to the peroxygen compound preferablyranges from about 1:1 to about 2:1 and is more preferably about 1:1. Thepreferred weight ratio of the metasilicate and sesquisilicate to thechelator preferably ranges from about 5:1 to about 15:1 and mostpreferably is about 6:1.

The cleaning composition can further include a surfactant, such as awetting agent, emulsifying agent, or dispersing agent. The surfactantmust be functional in an alkaline solution. Suitable surfactants arenonionic, anionic and amphoteric surfactants. Preferred nonionicsurfactants include octylphenoxy-polyethoxy-ethanol (e.g., sold underthe trademark TRITON X-100), nonyl phenoxy ethyleneoxy ethanol (e.g.,sold under the trademark IGEPAL CO730), nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)ethanol (e.g., sold under the trademark IGEPAL CO630),octylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol (e.g., sold under the trademarkIGEPAL 630), polyoxy ethoxylated ethanol (e.g., sold under the trademarkRENEX ZO), glycol fatty esters (e.g., sold under the trademarkHALLCO-376-N), fatty acid alkylanolamid (e.g, sold under the trademarkALKAMIDE 2110), cetyldimethyl amine oxide (e.g., sold under thetrademark AMMONYX CO), aliphatic polyether (e.g., sold under thetrademark ANTAROX LF-344), polyethylenated alkyl glycol amide (e.g.,sold under the trademark ANTAROX G-200), fatty alcohol polyether (e.g.,sold under the trademark AROSURE 63-PE-16), polyoxyethylene sorbitolesters of mixed fatty and resin acids (e.g., sold under the trademarkATLAS G-1234), modified oxyethylated straight-chain alcohol (e.g., soldunder the trademark RENEX 648), modified oxyethoxylated straight-chainalcohols (e.g. sold under the trademark PLURAFAC RA, ZO), alkylarylpolyether (e.g., sold under the trademark TRITON CF10), trifunctionalpolyoxyalkylene glycols (e.g., sold under the trademark PLURADOTHA-410), diethylene glycol dioleate, polyethylene glycol recinaleate,polyethylene glycol dioleate, tridecyl alcohol, nonylphenol, andethylene oxide condensation products that are based on propyleneoxide-propylene glycol (e.g., sold under the trademark PLURONIC L-61),ethoxylated alkylphenols (e.g., sold under the trademarks IGEPAL RC-620,ALKASURF OP-12, and TRITON N-101), propoxylated and ethoxylated fattyacids, alcohols, or alkylphenols (e.g., sold under the trademarks TRITONXL-80N and ANTAROX BL-330), ethoxylated alcohols (e.g., sold under thetrademarks PLURAFAC A, TRITON CF-54, TERGITOL TMN-6, and TERGITOL15-5-7), alkoxylated linear aliphatic alcohol (e.g., sold under thetrademark OLIN SL-42), and alcohol alkoxylate (e.g., sold under thetrademark SURFONIC LF-17). Preferred anionic surfactants includeethoxylated (3 moles) phosphate ester (e.g., sold under the trademarkTRITON QS-44), sodium sulfate of 2 ethyl-a-hexanol (e.g., sold under thetrademark TERGITOL 08), sodium petroleum sulfonate (e.g., sold under thetrademark PETRONATE K), sodium alkyl naphthahalene sulfonate (e.g., soldunder the trademark PETRO AR, SELLOGEN K, NEKAL BX-78, ALKANOL B),primary alkane sulfonate (e.g., sold under the trademark BIO TERGPAS-8S), dioctyl ester of sodium sulfosuccinic acid (e.g., sold underthe trademark ABRESOL OT), sodium alkylaryl sulfonate (e.g., sold underthe trademark AHCOWET ANS), sodium salt of sulfated alkylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol (e.g., sold under the trademark ALIPALEO-526), sodium methyl n-oleyl-taurate (e.g., sold under the trademarkAMATER G T), alkyl polyphosphate (e.g., sold under the trademark ATCOWETC2), sodium lauryl sulfate (e.g., sold under the trademark AVIROL 101),sodium N-methyl-N-tall oil acid taurate (e.g., sold under the trademarkIGEPON TK-32), lauric alkyloamine condensate (e.g., sold under thetrademark NOPCOGEN 14-L), fatty alcohol sulfate modified (e.g. soldunder the trademark RICHOLOL 4940), modified diethanolamides of fattyacids (e.g., sold under the trademark SHERCOMID), sulfates of alcohols(e.g., sold under the trademark STANDOPAL LF), sulfonates of naphthaleneand alkyl naphthalene (e.g., sold under the trademark PETRO WP) andalkanolamides (e.g., sold under the trademark NOPCO 1179). Preferredamphoteric surfactants include disodium N-tallow betamino dipropionate(e.g., sold under the trademark DERIPHATE 154), sodium derivative ofdicarboxylic caprylic acid (e.g., sold under the trademark MIRANOL J2M,letithin (e.g., sold under the trademark CENTROL CA, LA), laurylampholytic (syndet) (e.g., sold under the trademark SCHERCOTERIC BASE156), carboxylic acid derivatives of substituted imidazolines (e.g.,sold under the trademark MONATERIC), complex coco betaine (e.g., soldunder the trademark CARSONAM 3 AND 3147), fatty sulfobetaine (e.g., soldunder the trademark LONZAINE CS), dicarboxylic coconut derivativetriethanolamine (e.g., sold under the trademark MIRANOL TEA),dicarboxylic octoic derivative sodium salt (e.g. sold under thetrademark MIRANOL JEM), dicarboxylic myristic derivative diethanolamine(e.g., sold under the trademark MIRANOL M2M-DEM), dicarboxylic myristicderivative monoethanolamine (e.g., sold under the trademark MIRANOLM2M-MEA), dicarboxylic myristic derivative sodium salt (e.g., sold underthe trademark MIRANOL M2M-SF), dicarboxylic capric derivativediethanolamine (e.g., sold under the trademark MIRANOL S2M-DEA),imidazolnes and imidazline derivatives (e.g., sold under the trademarkMONATERIC 949-J), dicarboxylic capric derivative triethanolamine (e.g.,sold under the trademark MIRANOL S2M-TEA), and other amphotericsurfactants (e.g., sold under the trademark PHOSPHOTERIC T-C6).

More preferred surfactants include (i) the nonionic surfactants,nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol (e.g., sold under the trademarkIGEPAL CO630), octylphenoxypoly (ethyleneoxy) ethanol (e.g., sold underthe trademark IGEPAL 630), ethoxylated alkylphenols (e.g., sold underthe trademarks IGEPAL RC-620, ALKASURF OP-12, and TRITON N-101),propoxylated and ethoxylated fatty acids, alcohols, or alkylphenols(e.g., sold under the trademarks TRITON XL-80N and ANTAROX BL-330),ethoxylated alcohols (e.g., sold under the trademarks PLURAFAC A, TRITONCF-54, TERGITOL TMN-6, and TERGITOL 15-5-7), alkoxylated linearaliphatic alcohol (e.g., sold under the trademark OLIN SL-42),diethylene glycol dioleate, polyethylene glycol recinaleate,polyethylene glycol dioleate, tridecyl alcohol, nonylphenol, andethylene oxide condensation products that are based on propyleneoxide-propylene glycol (e.g., sold under the trademark PLURONIC L-61),and alcohol alkoxylate (e.g., sold under the trademark SURFONIC LF-17);(ii) the anionic surfactants, primary alkane sulfonate (e.g., sold underthe trademark BIO TERG PAS-8S), sulfates of alcohols (e.g., sold underthe trademark STANDOPAL LF), sulfonates of naphthalene and alkylnaphthalene (e.g., sold under the trademark PETRO WP), and alkanolamides(e.g., sold under the trademark NOPCO 1179); and (iii) the amphotericsurfactants, imidazolnes and imidazline derivatives (e.g., sold underthe trademark MONATERIC 949-J), and the amphoteric surfactant sold underthe trademark PHOSPHOTERIC T-C6.

Most preferred surfactants include the low foaming surfactants, primaryalkane sulfonate sold under the trademark BIO TERG PAS-8S and propyleneoxide and ethylene oxide block polymer sold under the trademark PLURONICL-61 and the high foaming surfactants,nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)ethanol sold under the trademark IGEPAL CO630 and octylphenoxypoly (ethyleneoxy)ethanol sold under the trademarkIGEPAL CA 630.

The amount of the surfactant in the cleaning composition is important tothe effectiveness of the cleaning composition. Preferably, the cleaningcomposition contains at least about 2.5% by weight and more preferablyfrom about 2.5% to about 8% by weight, and most preferably from about2.5% to about 5% by weight of the surfactant.

The cleaning composition can also include a gelling agent to provide agel formulation for applying the cleaning composition to soiled objects.The cleaning ability of the cleaning composition is facilitated by theadherence properties of the gel. For instance, such gel formulations areparticularly useful for thick charred organic buildups on barbecuegrills. Preferred gelling agents include carboxymethyl cellulose,hydroxymethylcellulose and modified polyacrylamide. The preferredconcentration of the gelling agent in the cleaning composition rangesfrom about 6% to about 12% by weight.

To apply the cleaning composition with a gelling agent, the cleaningcomposition is preferably combined with from about 7 to about 14 partsby weight water and the mixture is placed in a pressurized vessel atabout 160 psi. As the pressure is released, the mixture is ejected fromthe vessel onto the object to be cleaned. The mixture can include a foambuilder such as nonylphenoxy polyethoxyethanol to enhance the foamingcharacteristics of the mixture.

The above-noted components of the cleaning composition are combined bysuitable techniques for forming granulated cleaners. For example, thevarious components are added to a vessel as follows: (i) the variousbuilders are added first, preferably in an anhydrous form, and blendedtogether, (ii) the surfactant is added second and blended with thebuilders, (iii) water is added after or simultaneously with thesurfactants and blended with the surfactants and builders for asufficient period of time for substantially all of the water to formhydrates with the builder(s), (iv) the metasilicate and/orsesquisilicate, chelate, and peroxygen compound are added in that order,and (v) the gelling agent is added last. The various components can beblended with any suitable device. In the preceding steps, the peroxygencompound must be maintained separate from water and the surfactant asthe peroxygen compound will react with water and/or the surfactant,thereby releasing oxygen and neutralizing the peroxygen compound. Thus,the surfactant must be added to the vessel before the peroxygencompound.

The addition of water in the third step must be carefully controlled. Iftoo much water is added, the resulting cleaning composition will not bea free flowing particulate, as desired, but will be a highly viscousmass. If too little water is added, the surfactant may not beimmobilized and can react with the peroxygen compound. Preferably, theminimum amount of water added is the stoichiometric amount that issufficient to form hydrates with substantially all of the hydratablebuilders and the maximum amount of water added is no more than about150% and more preferably no more than about 125% of the stoichiometricamount. By way of example, if sodium carbonate (Na₂ CO₃) is thehydratable builder the molar ratio of sodium carbonate to waterpreferably ranges from about 50:1 to about 175:1 and most preferablyfrom about 100:1 to about 150:1. In most applications, the molar ratioof hydratable builders to water also ranges from about 50:1 to about175:1 and more preferably from about 100:1 to about 150:1, and the totalamount of water added to the cleaning composition in the third step andtotal amount of water in the cleaning composition, whether occurring asfree or hydrated molecules, ranges from about 0.1 to about 0.5% byweight of the final cleaning composition, with 0.1% by weight being mostpreferred. The free moisture content of the cleaning composition ispreferably no more than about 0.1% by weight of the cleaningcomposition.

The blending time of the third step must also be carefully controlled tosubstantially minimize the amount of free water molecules present in thecleaning composition. The water/surfactant/builder blend must be blendedfor a sufficient period of time for the water to react withsubstantially all of the hydratable builders and for substantially allof the surfactant to form bonds with the hydrated builders. Preferably,the blending in the third step has a duration of at least about 5minutes after water addition and more preferably ranging from about 5 toabout 10 minutes.

As noted above, the cleaning composition is preferably a dry, granularmaterial. Before use, the cleaning composition can be dissolved inwater, or other suitable carrier, to form a cleaning solution. To ensurethat the cleaning composition dissolves rapidly in cold or luke warmwater, the particle sizes of the various ingredients are that of a lightdensity material. Light density materials have a large surface areaallowing quicker solubility in cold or luke warm water. Preferably, thecleaning composition has a mean particle size ranging from about 20 toabout 100 mesh (Tyler), more preferably from about 30 to about 60 mesh(Tyler), and most preferably from about 30 to about 50 mesh (Tyler). Thepreferred concentration of the cleaning composition in the cleaningsolution is discussed below. The cleaning solution preferably has pHranging from about pH 8 to about pH 12 and more preferably from about pH10 to about pH 11.

The method for using the cleaning solution to remove organic depositsfrom an object will now be described. Before applying the stepsdescribed below, the various components of the cleaning composition arecombined in the appropriate amounts and ratios to provide the cleaningcomposition.

In the first step, the cleaning composition is combined with water toform the cleaning solution and the cleaning solution applied to theobject. The cleaning solution is applied to the object for a sufficientperiod of time to remove the foreign deposit. Preferably, theapplication is effectuated by soaking the object in the cleaningsolution in a soak-tank or spraying the cleaning solution on the object.The soaking of the object can be accomplished by quiet soak or bycirculating the cleaning solution about the object. The temperature ofthe cleaning solution is preferably no more than about 190° F., morepreferably less than about 160° F., and most preferably less than about120° F. Depending on the soil load, the time required to solubilize mostforeign deposits into the cleaning solution is preferably no more thanabout 8 hours for soaking techniques and no more than about 2 hours forspraying techniques.

The concentration of the cleaning composition in the cleaning solutiondepends upon the type of foreign deposit and application technique. Inmost applications, the preferred aqueous concentration of the cleaningagent in the cleaning solution ranges from about 2 to about 8 percent byweight. For soak-tank applications, the cleaning solution morepreferably contains from about 3% by weight of the cleaning compositionfor cleaning heavily soiled, carbonized baking pans; about 0.75% byweight of the cleaning composition (at 120 to 160° F.) for cleaningbrewery kettles; about 3% by weight of the cleaning composition (at roomtemperature) for cleaning aluminum baking pans; about 3% by weight ofthe cleaning composition (above the boiling point) for cleaning deep fatfryers; about 2% by weight of the cleaning composition (at 140° F.) forcleaning china plates; about 2% by weight of the cleaning compositionfor cleaning objects having carbon or protein deposits; and as much as5% by weight of the cleaning composition for cleaning other types ofheavy soiled objects. For spray and other clean-in-place applications,the cleaning solution more preferably has a concentration of thecleaning composition ranging from about 0.25% to about 5% by weight.However, because of the pressure with which the cleaning solution isapplied in these operations, a somewhat lower concentration may be usedthan for comparable cleaning required for mechanical soak-tank cleaning.

After the appropriate time, the cleaning composition is removed from theobject. Typically, the cleaning solution is removed by rinsing theobject with water. After removal, the cleaning solution typically has apH ranging from about pH 9 to about pH 12.

EXAMPLES

The present cleaning composition will now be further described byreference to the following illustrative examples in which all referencesto "parts" and percentages are on a weight basis.

Example No. 1

For cleaning a deep fat fryer, an aqueous solution having a 2.4% byweight concentration of the present cleaning composition was placed inthe deep fat fryer and allowed to sit at ambient room temperaturewithout agitation for 8 hours. The solution was removed and the fryerrinsed with water. The deep fat fryer had over 90% of the carbon removedwithout scouring or rubbing of any kind. When compared against astandard caustic cleaner comprised of 80% by weight caustic soda, 15% byweight builder and 5% by weight surfactant, using the same soak time,temperature and concentration, only 40% of the carbon was removed.Furthermore, when the caustic cleaner was used at 190° F. for 4 hours at2.4% by weight, the deep fat fryer was only 80% clean.

Example No. 2

For cleaning bakery pans, a solution having a 2.4% by weightconcentration of the present cleaning composition was used for immersingaluminum bakery pans for 31/2 hours at 120° F. The pans were initiallycovered with baked-on carbon from the commercial ovens as well astypical food soils and food stains. After the 31/2 hour soak, all carbonand food soils were removed without agitation, scouring or rubbing. Notethat no standard caustic cleaner could be used on the aluminum panswithout major damage to the pans. Further note that normal silicatedbakery pan cleaners will not remove carbon due to their lack ofpenetrating power.

In addition to the above examples, it has been determined that heavilysoiled, carbonized baking pans at ambient room temperature can beeffectively cleaned by soaking in a solution having a 3% by weightconcentration of the present cleaning composition.

Example No. 3

For removing protein and beer stone deposits in a micro brewery, asolution having a 1% by weight concentration of the present cleaningcomposition was circulated about the deposits at 150° F. for 30 minutes.The cleaning effectiveness was compared against a standard liquid and asoda powder chlorinated caustic cleaner. In each case the presentcleaning composition outperformed the caustic cleaners in protein andbeer stone removal, at lower temperatures and in substantially less time(in most cases the time was 1/4 to 1/3 of the normal time required forthe caustic cleaners).

The two caustic cleaners (one a powder and one a liquid) against whichthe present cleaning composition was compared had the followingingredients:

    ______________________________________                   Powder   Liquid                   (% by weight)                            (% by weight)    ______________________________________    Caustic Soda Beads                     30         --    Caustic Soda Liquid 50%                     --         40    Polymer (ACUSOL 44)                     --         6    Sodium Tripolyphosphate                     25         --    Soda Ash Dense   29         --    Sodium Hypochlorite                     --         20    Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate                     3.0        --    surfactant (PLURONIC 25R2)                     2.0        --    Sodium Sulfate   10.0       --    Water            --         28.0    Potassium Silicate                     --         6.0    ______________________________________

Further note that it has been determined that using a 0.5% by weightsolution at 140° F. is effective for cleaning brewery kettles.

Example No. 4

For cleaning brass beer filters a solution having a 2% by weightconcentration of the present cleaning composition was applied at 180° F.for 20 minutes to brass beer filters. The present cleaning compositionremoved all visible protein and charred organics which had accumulatedfrom several years of beer processing. The normal cleaning agent used 3%by weight sodium hydroxide and was typically circulated for 2 hours.This process removed soils, but caused great corrosive and oxidationdamage to the filters. The present cleaning composition did a better jobat lower temperatures in less time and did not damage the filters. Thecalculated metal loss from corrosion was 11 ppm for the solution havingthe present cleaning composition as compared to 1,000 ppm when using thenormal caustic cleaning agent.

Example No. 5

For cleaning barbecue grills, a solution having a concentration of 1 lb.of the present cleaning composition dissolved in 5 gallons of water wasused. The barbecue grills, which were caked with grease and baked-oncarbon, were soaked overnight in the solution at ambient roomtemperature. This resulted in 98% of all carbon and food soils beingremoved upon rinsing with a slight spraying action and with a slightrubbing of the grills. Almost no residue or evidence of the grease orcarbon was visible in the waste water after soaking was complete. Notethat the standard caustic cleaners had very little effect.

Example No. 6

For cleaning restaurant grade ceramic china, a solution having aconcentration of 16 oz. of the present cleaning composition dissolved in5 gallons of water was used. Restaurant grade ceramic china plates andplatters were immersed in the solution for 3 hours at ambient roomtemperature. In everyday use these plates and platters are heated in anoven at 400° F. with steak and other red meat foods on them. The platesand platters are also placed directly on a heated grill surface thatheats to over 500° F. The plates and platters were initially coveredwith baked-on carbon, grease and other food soils as well asdiscoloration stains. After the plates and platters were washed withconventional cleaners in a dishwasher and by hand scrubbing, they stillwere covered with brown and black spot stains and baked-on carbon. Theyhad also become yellow in color instead of their original white. Afterthe 3 hour soak in the solution of the present invention at ambient roomtemperature, the plates became clean and whitened.

Example No. 7

Standard clean-in-place procedures at a dairy includes mixing a causticpowdered cleaner in water at 185° F. and circulating the mixture throughmilk lines tanks and an high-temperature short-time pasteurizer for 45minutes. The resulting waste water is discharged at a pH of 14. Thecaustic powdered cleaner had the following composition:

    ______________________________________    Caustic Soda        90.0%       by weight    Builder             5.0%        by weight    Sodium Gluconate    3.0%        by weight    Wetting Agent       2.0%        by weight    ______________________________________

A solution having a concentration of 1 lb. of the cleaning compositiondissolved in 5 gallons of water and heated to 185° F. was used in thesame manner. That is, the solution was circulated for 45 minutes in thesame manner as with the caustic cleaner. The cleaning results were farsuperior. All lines, valves and tanks were fully cleaned. Scalded areasthat needed manual scrubbing after the caustic cleaning procedure werenon-existent after circulating the solution having the present cleaningcomposition. Further, the high-temperature short-time pasteurizer hadpreviously always required manual scrubbing and cleaning on its last 15to 20 plates at the far end of the high temperature side of the pressafter each caustic cleaning. However, after the cleaning with thepresent cleaning composition, all plates including the very last onewere fully cleaned. No manual scrubbing was required and the waste waterdischarge was pH 7 to pH 9.

As an aside, note that the high pH 14 of the caustic waste waterdischarged by the dairy when using the caustic powdered cleaner isunacceptable to local municipal waste water treatment facilities.However, a pH of pH 7 to pH 9 is acceptable.

While various embodiments of the present invention have been describedin detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of thoseembodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to beexpressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are withinthe scope of the present invention, as set forth in the followingclaims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A cleaning composition comprising:(a) a peroxygencompound; (b) at least one of an anhydrous metasilicate orsesquisilicate; (c) at least one of a hydrated metasilicate orsesquisilicate; and (d) a chelate that is selected from the groupconsisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,N-hydroxyethmlenediaminetriacetic acid, and poly (alkylphosphonic acid),and mixtures thereof.
 2. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1,wherein said peroxygen compound is at least one of a perborate or apercarbonate.
 3. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1, whereinthe ratio by weight of said peroxygen compound to said chelate rangesfrom about 3:1 to 7:1.
 4. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1,wherein the amount of said peroxygen compound ranges from about 25% toabout 40% by weight.
 5. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1,said cleaning composition being in the form of a free-flowingparticulate, further comprising water, wherein the amount of said waterranges from about 0.1% to about 0.5% by weight of said cleaningcomposition.
 6. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1, saidcleaning composition being in the form of a free-flowing particulate andwherein said cleaning composition comprises from at least about 20% toabout 45% by weight of a hydrated builder other than a metasilicate orsesquisilicate.
 7. A cleaning composition as claimed in claim 1, furthercomprising a surfactant, wherein said surfactant is from about 2.5% toabout 5% by weight of said cleaning composition.
 8. A cleaningcomposition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the total content of bothfree water and water of hydration in the cleaning composition rangesfrom about 0.1 to about 0.5 wt %.
 9. A cleaning composition,comprising:(a) a hydrated builder other than a hydrated metasilicate orsesquisilicate; (b) a surfactant; (c) at least one of an anhydrousmetasilicate or sesquisilicate; (d) at least one of a hydratedmetasilicate or sesquisilicate; (e) a chelate selected from the groupconsisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,N-hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid, and poly (alkylphosphonic acid),and mixtures thereof; and (f) a peroxygen compound.
 10. A composition asclaimed in claim 9, wherein said composition comprises at least about20% by weight of said hydrated builder.
 11. A composition as claimed inclaim 9, wherein said composition comprises from about 25% to about 45%by weight of said hydrated builder.
 12. A composition as claimed inclaim 9, wherein said hydrated buider is selected from the groupconsisting of the following compounds: sodium carbonate sodiumsesquicarbonate, sodium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, tripolyphosphate,sodium hexametaphosphate, disodium phosphate, monosodium phosphate, andmixtures thereof.
 13. A composition as claimed in claim 9, wherein themolar ratio of said hydrated builder to said surfactant is at leastabout 4:1.
 14. A composition as claimed in claim 9, wherein the molarratio of said hydrated builder to said surfactant ranges from about 6:1to about 22:1.
 15. A composition as claimed in claim 9, wherein saidhydrated builder includes a phosphate and the composition includes fromabout 3% to about 15% by weight phosphate.
 16. A composition as claimedin claim 9, wherein said surfactant is from about 2.5% to about 5% byweight of said composition.
 17. A composition as claimed in claim 9,further comprising water and wherein the molar ratio of said hydratedbuilder to water ranges from about 50:1 to about 175:1.
 18. Acomposition as claimed in claim 9, further comprising water and whereinthe composition comprises from about 0.1% to about 0.5% by weight water.19. A free-flowing, particulate cleaning composition, comprising:(a) asurfactant; (b) at least one of an anhydrous metasilicate orsesquisilicate; (c) at least one of a hydrated metasilicate orsesquisilicate; (d) a peroxygen compound; and (e) a chelate selectedfrom the group consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,N-hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid, and poly (alkylphosphonic acid),and mixtures thereof.
 20. The free-flowing, particulate cleaningcomposition of claim 19, wherein the particulate cleaning compositionhas a mean particle size ranging from about 100 to about 20 mesh(Tyler).
 21. A method for forming a free-flowing, particulate cleaningcomposition, comprising:(a) contacting water, a surfactant, and ananhydrous builder to form a composition including a hydrated builderformed from the anhydrous builder and free water; and (b) thereaftercontacting said composition with at least one of an anhydrousmetasilicate or sesquisilicate and a chelate to form a secondcomposition; and (c) thereafter contacting said second composition witha peroxygen compound to form a cleaning composition.
 22. A method asclaimed in claim 21, wherein the duration of said first contacting stepranges from about 5 to about 10 minutes.
 23. A method as claimed inclaim 21, wherein the contacting step (b) comprises reacting the atleast one of an anhydrous metasilicate or sesquisilicate with the freewater to form at least one of a hydrated metasilicate or sesquisilicate.24. A method as claimed in claim 21, wherein in said contacting step (a)the molar ratio of hydrated builder to water ranges from about 50:1 toabout 175:1.
 25. A method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the cleaningcomposition comprises no more than about 0.1% by weight free watermolecules.
 26. A method for forming a free-flowing particulate cleaningcomposition, comprising:(a) contacting sequentially an anhydrousbuilder, surfactant, water, at least one of an anhydrous metasilicate orsesquisilicate, and a chelate to form an intermediate compositionincluding a hydrated builder formed from the anhydrous builder and atleast one of a hydrated metasilicate or sesquisilicate formed from theat least one of an anhydrous metasilicate or sesquisilicate; and (b)thereafter contacting the intermediate composition with a peroxygencompound to form said intermediate composition into a free-flowing,particulate cleaning composition.
 27. A method as claimed in claim 26,wherein the content of the peroxygen compound in the free-flowing,particulate cleaning composition ranges from about 25 to about 40 wt %.28. A method as claimed in claim 27, wherein the content of the chelatein the free-flowing, particulate cleaning composition ranges from about2 to about 8 wt %.
 29. A method as claimed in claim 28, wherein thecontent of the at least one of the anhydrous metasilicate orsesquisilicate and the at least one of the hydrated metasilicate orsesquisilicate in the free-flowing, particulate cleaning compositionranges from about 15 to about 40 wt %.
 30. A method as claimed in claim26, wherein the total content of both free water and water of hydrationin the cleaning composition ranges from about 0.1 to about 0.5 wt %. 31.A method as claimed in claim 26 wherein the chelate is selected from thegroup consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,N-hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid, and poly (alkylphosphonic acid),and mixtures thereof.